Digenea parasitizing snakes in Pampa Biome, southern Brazil

Digenea parasitando serpientes en el Bioma Pampa, sur de Brasil

Resumen

Knowing the parasitological fauna of wild animals, such as snakes, provides fundamental ecological information of both parasite and host. Digenea species have a heteroxenic life cycle, that is, they need 2 or more hosts to reach their adult form and reproduce, and their cycles can occur in aquatic, semi-aquatic or terrestrial environments (Marcogliese, 2004). Snakes are very important in food chains, since they are predators and prey for many different animals (Costa et al., 2014; Hartmann & Marques, 2005); in addition, they occupy diversified habitats (Bernarde, 2012; Marques et al., 2001). Such characteristics make these reptiles interesting hosts for digenetic trematodes, since they need to interact with the environment or other hosts to become infected and transport these helminths.

Brazil holds a total of 405 species of snakes (Costa & Bérnils, 2018); however, the diversity of Digenea is poorly known, with 41 species having been recorded parasitizing these reptiles in the country (Fernandes & Kohn, 2014; Quirino et al., 2018). In the extreme south of Brazil this number is even lower, with 4 Digenea species recorded in snakes of the Pampa Biome (Artigas et al., 1942; Ruiz & Leão, 1942a, b). However, parasitological studies with snakes in other countries that belong to this biome, such as Uruguay and Argentina, have reported 13 and 23 Digenea species, respectively (Fernandes & Kohn, 2014). The Pampa Biome is characterized by native grasslands with riparian forests, hillside forests, shrub formations, wetlands, and rocky outcrops (Overback et al., 2015), which provide a rich snake fauna. 

Therefore, the objective of this study was to record Digenea species and their infection indices in 11 snake species in the Pampa Biome, extreme south of Brazil, and contribute to the knowledge of the parasitological fauna of these animals in Brazilian territory.

Materials and methods

There were 42 specimens examined belonging to: Atractus reticulatus (Boulenger, 1885) (n = 1), Phalotris lemniscatus (Duméril, Bibron & Duméril, 1854) (n = 1), Philodryas aestiva (Duméril, Bibron & Duméril, 1854) (n = 1), Erythrolamprus jaegeri (Günther, 1858) (n = 2), Thamnodynastes strigatus (Günther, 1858) (n = 2), Dipsas ventrimaculatus (Boulenger, 1885) (n = 3), Philodryas olfersii (Lichtenstein, 1823) (n = 4), Pseudablabes patagoniensis (Girard, 1858) (n = 6), Helicops infrataeniatus Jan, 1865 (n = 6), Erythrolamprus poecilogyrus (Wied-Neuwied, 1825) (n = 10) (Dipsadidae) and Bothrops alternatus (Duméril, Bibron & Duméril, 1854) (n = 6) (Viperidae). The snakes came from the municipalities of Capão do Leão (31º45’48” S, 52º29’02” W), Pelotas (31º46’19” S, 52º20’33” W), Rio Grande (32º02’06” S, 52º05’55” W), Encruzilhada do Sul (30º32’38” S, 52º31’19” W) and Dom Pedrito (30º58’58” S, 54º40’23” W), Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Thirty-four were collected dead on roads from March 2017 to June 2019. The collections were licensed by Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (ICMBio No. 38913). Four snakes were donated by the Núcleo de Reabilitação da Fauna Silvestre and Centro de Triagem de Animais Silvestres of the Federal University of Pelotas (NURFS-CETAS/UFPel), where they died after a rehabilitation attempt. Four E. poecilogyrus were donated by the Vertebrate Zoology Laboratory of the Federal University of Pelotas, where the specimens were fixed in formalin and conserved in 70°GL alcohol.

The hosts were necropsied for analysis of the infection sites. The helminths were compressed and fixed in AFA, conserved in 70% ethanol, stained with Langeron carmine or Delafield hematoxylin, cleared with creosote and mounted with Canada balsam (Amato et al., 1991). The systematic determination of the helminths was carried out following the approaches given by Artigas et al. (1942), Mañé-Garzón and Gortari (1965), Mañé-Garzón and Holcman-Spector (1967), Artigas and Perez (1969), Sey (1983), Jones (2005) and Tkach (2008a, b). The parasitological indices were calculated according to Bush et al. (1997). The specimens were deposited in the helminth collection of the Laboratory of Wild Animal Parasitology (CHLAPASIL-UFPel), and the helminthological collection at the Instituto Oswaldo Cruz (CHIOC). The photomicrographs were done in the Olympus^® BX 41 microscope with attached camera system and the images were prepared in Adobe Photoshop^®CS5. 

Results 

A total of 178 specimens belonging to 9 taxa of Digenea were found parasitizing 50% of the snakes analyzed. Erythrolamprus jaegeri, D. ventrimaculatus, P. lemniscatus and A. reticulatus showed no association with these helminths. A taxonomic summary of results is provided below.

Opisthogonimidae Travassos, 1928

Opisthogonimus Lühe, 1900

Opisthogonimus megabothrium Pereira, 1928 (Fig. 1A)

Hosts: Erythrolamprus poecilogyrus (Wied-Neuwied, 1825).

Developmental stage: adult.

Site of infection: oral cavity.

Prevalence, mean abundance and mean intensity of infection: 10% (1/10), 0.1 and 1.0 helminth/host.

Locality: Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

Specimens deposited: 858 (CHLAPASIL-UFPel).

Opisthogonimus lecithonotus Lühe, 1900 (Fig. 1B)

Hosts: Thamnodynastes strigatus (Günther, 1858), Pseudablabes patagoniensis (Girard, 1858), Philodryas olfersii (Lichtenstein, 1823) and Helicops infrataeniatus Jan, 1865.

Developmental stage: adult.

Site of infection: oral cavity and esophagus.

Prevalence, mean abundance and mean intensity of infection: P. patagoniensis: 83.33% (5/6), 6.16 and 7.4 helminths/host; P. olfersii: 75% (3/4), 3.0 and 4.0 helminths/host; T. strigatus: 50% (1/2), 1.5 and 3.0 helminths/host; H. infrataeniatus: 16.66% (1/6), 0.66 and 4.0 helminths/host.

Locality: Capão do Leão, Pelotas and Dom Pedrito, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

Specimens deposited: 859-866 (CHLAPASIL-UFPel); 39732a-b, 39733 (CHIOC).

Opisthogonimus sulina (Artigas, Ruiz & Leão, 1942) (Fig. 1C)

Hosts: Philodryas aestiva (Duméril, Bibron & Duméril, 1854).

Developmental stage: adult.

Site of infection: oral cavity.

Prevalence, mean abundance and mean intensity of infection: 100% (1/1), 6.0 and 6.0 helminths/host.

Locality: Capão do Leão, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

Specimens deposited:856-857 (CHLAPASIL-UFPel).

Opisthogonimus sp. 

Hosts: Erythrolamprus poecilogyrus (Wied-Neuwied, 1825), Helicops infrataeniatus Jan, 1865 and Bothrops alternatus (Duméril, Bibron & Duméril, 1854).

Developmental stage: adult.

Site of infection: oral cavity and esophagus.

Prevalence, mean abundance and mean intensity of infection: E. poecilogyrus: 20% (2/10), 0.2 and 1.0 helminth/host; H. infrataeniatus: 16.66% (1/6), 0.16 and 1.0 helminth/host; B. alternatus: 16.66% (1/6), 0.16 and 1.0 helminth/host.

Locality: Capão do Leão and Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

Specimens deposited: 961-963 (CHLAPASIL-UFPel). 

Remarks

Opisthogonimus parasites the oral cavity and esophagus of snakes, with 12 species recorded in Brazil (Fernandes & Kohn, 2014). Metacercariae of Opisthogonimus have been recorded in several species of anurans in Argentina (Hamann & González, 2009; Hamann et al., 2012), indicating these vertebrates as secondary intermediate hosts in the helminth cycle. The specimens of Opisthogonimus sp. found in this study presented a large quantity of eggs, making it difficult to visualize the diagnostic structures. Opisthogonimus megabothrium (Fig. 1A) differs from the other species found because it has an acetabulum twice as large as its oral sucker. Opisthogonimus lecithonotus (Fig. 1B) and O. sulina (Fig. 1C) differ in the size of the caeca, being long and short, respectively, and position of the vitellaria, arranged in the same field and in 2 distinct fields, respectively (Artigas, 1942; Artigas & Perez, 1969). Despite some records for snakes in Brazil (Fernandes & Kohn, 2014), the association between O. sulina with P. aestiva, O. megabothrium with E. poecilogyrus and O. lecithonotus with T. strigatus, P. patagoniensis, P. olfersii and H. infrataeniatus are reported for the first time in the country. 

 

Plagiorchiidae Lühe, 1901

Styphlodora Looss, 1899

Styphlodora gili Mañé-Garzón & Holcman-Spector, 1967 (Fig. 1D)

Hosts: Bothrops alternatus (Duméril, Bibron & Duméril, 1854).

Developmental stage: adult.

Site of infection: kidney.

Prevalence, mean abundance and mean intensity of infection: 33.33% (2/6), 2.16 and 6.5 helminths/host.

Locality: Rio Grande and Capão do Leão, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

Specimens deposited:848-849 (CHLAPASIL-UFPel); 39734a-b (CHIOC).

Styphlodora sp. 1 (Fig. 1E)

Hosts: Pseudablabes patagoniensis (Girard, 1858) and Erythrolamprus poecilogyrus (Wied-Neuwied, 1825).

Developmental stage: adult.

Site of infection: stomach, large intestine and coelomic cavity.

Prevalence, mean abundance and mean intensity of infection: P. patagoniensis: 16.66% (1/6), 12.0 and 72.0 helminths/host; E. poecilogyrus: 10% (1/10), 0.1 and 1.0 helminth/host.

Locality: Capão do Leão and Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

Specimens deposited: 850-851(CHLAPASIL-UFPel).

Styphlodora sp. 2 (Fig. 1F)

Hosts: Bothrops alternatus (Duméril, Bibron & Duméril, 1854).

Developmental stage: adult.

Site of infection: large intestine.

Prevalence, mean abundance and mean intensity of infection: 16.66% (1/6), 0.33 and 2.0 helminths/host.

Locality: Dom Pedrito, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

Specimens deposited:852 (CHLAPASIL-UFPel).

Remarks

Styphlodora comprises species that can be found in the gastrointestinal and excretory systems of reptiles. Little is known about the biology of the species of this genus, the vast majority of papers are about taxonomy (Byrd et al., 1940), however, in general, life cycles of the species of Plagiorchidae include 3 hosts (Bowman, 2014). Hamann and Gonzales (2009) recorded larval forms of Styphlodora in tadpole, indicating amphibians as second intermediate hosts. The morphotypes collected in this study differed mainly by the shape, position and extension of the vitellariae in the body, as well as site of infection. Styphlodora gili was described in B. alternatus in Uruguay (Mañé-Garzón & Holcman-Spector, 1967), and in the present study we also reported parasitizing this snake species, characterizing then the first record of this trematode in B. alternatus in Brazil. We also recorded Styphlodora spp. in P. patagoniensis and E. poecilogyrus and B. alternatus in Brazil.

Plagiorchiidae Lühe, 1901

Travtrema Pereira, 1929

Travtrema stenocotyle (Cohn, 1902) (Fig. 2A)

Hosts: Erythrolamprus poecilogyrus (Wied-Neuwied, 1825).

Developmental stage: adult.

Site of infection: stomach, small intestine, large intestine and coelomic cavity.

Prevalence, mean abundance and mean intensity of infection: 40% (4/10), 2.2 and 5.5 helminths/host.

Locality: Pelotas and Capão do Leão, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

Specimens deposited: 853-854 (CHLAPASIL-UFPel).

Remarks

Travtrema stenocotyle is a parasite of the gastrointestinal system of snakes. This species uses mollusks as intermediate hosts and amphibians as secondary intermediate hosts (Ostrowski-De Núñez, 1979, in Pinto et al., 2012). Travtrema stenocotyle is common in snakes, existing several records in Brazil, including in E. poecilogyrus (Fernandes & Kohn, 2014), and some in Rio Grande do Sul (RS) in Xenodon merremi (Wagler, 1824), Thamnodynastes pallidus (Linnaeus, 1758) and P. patagoniensis (Ruiz & Leão, 1942b); however, it is reported for the first time in E. poecilogyrus in RS.

Diplodiscidae Cohn, 1904

Catadiscus Cohn, 1904 

Catadiscus sp. (Fig. 2B)

Hosts: Erythrolamprus poecilogyrus (Wied-Neuwied, 1825).

Developmental stage: adult.

Site of infection: stomach.

Prevalence, mean abundance and mean intensity of infection: 10% (1/10), 0.9 and 9.0 helminths/host.

Locality: Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

Specimens deposited: 855 (CHLAPASIL-UFPel).

Remarks

Catadiscus Cohn, 1904 comprises species that parasitize the intestines of amphibians and rarely reptiles (Hamann, 1992). Biology of Catadiscus species that parasitize snakes is little known, but the species of this genus in general are transmitted through the ingestion of metacercariae and have mollusks as first intermediate hosts (Kehr & Hamann, 2003). Five species of Catadiscus have been recorded in snakes in South America (Fernandes & Kohn, 2014). Catadiscus uruguayensis Freitas & Lent, 1939 has already been recorded in E. poecilogyrus in Argentina (Lunaschi & Drago, 2002), therefore this trematode is reported for the first time in Brazil for this snake species.

Discussion

All snakes analyzed in this study have a restricted distribution to the South American continent (Uetz et al., 2021). However, most records of Digenea in these hosts are in Argentina and the southeastern and central-western regions of Brazil (Table 1), which highlights the importance of studies in this area. 

Even with only 1 individual of P. aestiva sampled, it was possible to report, for the first time, digenetic helminths in this species. On the other hand, there is still a large gap on the parasitic fauna of P. lemniscatus and A. reticulatus, which may be related to the fossorial habit of these species that implies difficulties for their sampling (Balestrin et al., 2007; Quintela & Loebmann, 2009); therefore, in the present study only 1 individual of each species was sampled.

Habitats and host behavior may influence the parasite fauna of snakes, since those hosts that had higher abundance and richness of parasites are related to semi-aquatic and grassland environments, like E. poecilogyrus, P. patagoniensis, and B. alternatus. These environments are favorable for the development and maintenance of digenetic helminths and their networks of interactions, since parasites of this group use aquatic and semi-aquatic organisms as intermediate and paratenic hosts. 

Many digeneans found in the snakes analyzed, such as Opisthogonimus spp., Styphlodora spp. and Travtrema stenocotyle, have as intermediate hosts amphibian anurans (Hamann & González, 2009; Hamann et al., 2012; Ostrowski-De Núñez, 1979 in Pinto et al., 2012), which are food resources for several snake species (Thaler et al., 2018; Vasconcelos-Filho et al., 2015). Some of these parasites were present in B. alternatus, corroborating diet studies of the species, which, besides mammals, can also feed on amphibians, even if sporadically (Bellini et al., 2015). Although the diet of D. ventrimaculatus is specialized in mollusks (Quintela & Loebmann, 2009), which are intermediate hosts of digenetic trematodes, the 3 individuals of this snake analyzed did not present digeneans, what may be related to the low number of hosts sampled, since there are records in Argentina (Lunaschi & Sutton, 1985; Poumarau, 1968 in Fernandes & Kohn, 2014).

Table 1

Records of Digenea parasitizing the snake species analyzed in the study, geographic distribution of these snakes according to Uetz et al. (2021) and locality of the helminthological records. ARG = Argentina; BOL = Bolivia; BRA = Brazil; COL = Colombia; GUF = French Guiana; GUY = Guyana; PRY = Paraguay; PER = Peru; URY = Uruguay; VEN = Venezuela.

Snake and distribution	Digenea	Locality of the helminthological records (Reference)
Pseudablabes patagoniensis ARG; BOL; BRA; PRY; URY	Opisthogonimus afranioi	Precise location not available, BRA (Pereira, 1929 apud Fernandes & Kohn, 2014); Colonia, URY (Mañé-Garzón & Gortari, 1965)
	Opisthogonimus lecithonotus	Tucumán, ARG (Poumarau, 1968 apud Fernandes & Kohn, 2014 and Lunaschi & Drago, 2007); Canelones, URY (Mañé-Garzón & Gortari, 1965); Capão do Leão, Rio Grande do Sul, BRA (present study)
	Opisthogonimus sulina	Tuparaí, Itaqui, Rio Grande do Sul, BRA (Artigas et al., 1942); Precise location not available, BRA (Freitas, 1956 apud Fernandes & Kohn, 2014); Nico Pérez, Lavalleja, URY (Mañé-Garzón & Gortari, 1965)
	Opisthogonimus fonsecai	Precise location not available, BRA (Pinto et al., 2012)
	Opisthogonimus interrogativus	Precise location not available, BRA (Pereira, 1929 apud Fernandes & Kohn, 2014)
	Styphlodora condita	Precise location not available, ARG (Poumarau, 1968 apud Fernandes & Kohn, 2014; Lunaschi & Sutton, 1985)
	Travtrema stenocotyle	Villa Elisa, La Plata, Buenos Aires, ARG (Lunaschi & Sutton, 1985); Tuparaí, Itaqui, Rio Grande do Sul, BRA; Boa Esperança do Sul, São Paulo, BRA; Pitangueiras, São Paulo, BRA (Ruiz & Leão, 1942b); Precise location not available, BRA (Freitas & Dobbin Jr., 1957 apud Fernandes & Kohn, 2014 and Ostrowski de Núñez, 1979)
	Paradistomum parvissimum	Precise location not available, BRA (Travassos, 1944 apud Fernandes & Kohn, 2014)
	Renifer heterocoelium	Precise location not available, BRA (Corrêa et al., 1990; Pinto et al., 2012)
	Styphlodora sp. 1	Capão do Leão, Rio Grande do Sul, BRA (present study)
Philodryas olfersii  ARG; BOL; BRA; COL; GUF; GUY; PRY; PER; URY; VEN	Infidum similis	Precise location not available, ARG (Poumarau, 1968 apud Fernandes & Kohn, 2014)
	Catadiscus longicoecalis	Precise location not available, ARG (Poumarau, 1968 apud Fernandes & Kohn, 2014)
	Opisthogonimus lecithonotus	Capão do Leão, Rio Grande do Sul, BRA (present study)
Philodryas aestiva ARG; BOL; BRA; PRY; URY	Opisthogonimus sulina	Capão do Leão, Rio Grande do Sul, BRA (present study)
Erythrolamprus poecilogyrus ARG; BOL; BRA; GUY; PRY; PER; URY; VEN	Opisthogonimus fonsecai	Precise location not available, BRA (Pinto et al., 2012)
	Opisthogonimus serpentis	Cornélio Procópio, Paraná, BRA (Artigas et al., 1943)
Table 1. Continued
Snake and distribution	Digenea	Locality of the helminthological records (Reference)
	Opisthogonimus megabothrium	Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, BRA (present study)
	Opisthogonimus sp.	Capão do Leão, Rio Grande do Sul, BRA (present study); Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, BRA (present study)
	Travtrema stenocotyle	Zelaya, Buenos Aires, ARG (Ostrowski de Núñez, 1979); Araçatuba, São Paulo, BRA (Ruiz & Leão, 1942b); Capão do Leão, Rio Grande do Sul, BRA (present study); Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, BRA (present study)
	Renifer heterocoelium	Precise location not available, BRA (Corrêa et al., 1990; Pinto et al., 2012)
	Ophiodiplostomum spectabile	Precise location not available, BRA (Pinto et al., 2012); Paraná, BRA; São Paulo, BRA (Ruiz & Rangel, 1954)
	Infidum similis	Precise location not available, BRA (Ruiz & Leão, 1943 and Travassos, 1944 apud Fernandes & Kohn, 2014)
	Mesocoelium monas	Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, BRA (Freitas, 1963)
	Heterodiplostomum lanceolatum	Ruta Transchaco, Presidente Hayes, PRY (Dubois, 1988)
	Catadiscus uruguayensis	Laguna Salada Grande, General Lavalle, Buenos Aires, ARG (Lunaschi & Drago, 2002)
	Catadiscus sp.	Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, BRA (present study)
	Styphlodora sp. 1	Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, BRA (present study)
Erythrolamprus jaegeri ARG; BRA; PRY; URY	Opisthogonimus megabothrium	Punta Lara, Ensenada, Buenos Aires, ARG (Lunaschi & Sutton, 1985)
	Travtrema stenocotyle	Punta Lara, Ensenada, Buenos Aires, ARG (Lunaschi & Sutton, 1985)
Helicops infrataeniatus ARG; BRA; PRY; URY	Opisthogonimus lecithonotus	Corrientes, ARG (Lunaschi & Drago, 2007); Capão do Leão, Rio Grande do Sul, BRA (present study)
	Opisthogonimus serpentis	Precise location not available, BRA (Rodrigues & Santos, 1974 apud Fernandes & Kohn, 2014)
	Opisthogonimus sp.	Capão do Leão, Rio Grande do Sul, BRA (present study)
	Heterodiplostomum helicopsis	Precise location not available, URY (Mañé-Garzón & Alonso, 1976 apud Fernandes & Kohn, 2014)
Thamnodynastes strigatus ARG; BRA; PRY; URY	Opisthogonimus lecithonotus	Juan Jose Castelli, Chaco, ARG; Ituzaingo, Corrientes, ARG; Posadas, Misiones, ARG (Martínez et al., 1996); Chaco, ARG; Corrientes, ARG; Misiones, ARG (Lunaschi & Drago, 2007); Capão do Leão, Rio Grande do Sul, BRA (present study)
	Styphlodora condita	Precise location not available, ARG (Poumarau, 1968 apud Fernandes & Kohn, 2014)
	Liophistrema buccalis	Artilleros, Colonia, URY (Holcman-Spector & Mañé-Garzón, 1973)
Dipsas ventrimaculatus ARG; BRA; PRY	Mesocoelium monas	Precise location not available, ARG (Poumarau, 1968 apud Fernandes & Kohn, 2014)
	Travtrema stenocotyle	Precise location not available, ARG (Lunaschi & Sutton, 1985; Poumarau, 1968 apud Fernandes & Kohn, 2014)
Table 1. Continued
Snake and distribution	Digenea	Locality of the helminthological records (Reference)
Bothrops alternatus  ARG; BRA; PRY; URY	Opisthogonimus lecithonotus	Precise location not available, ARG (Poumarau, 1968 apud Fernandes & Kohn, 2014); Machagai, Chaco, ARG; Ituzaingo, Corrientes, ARG (Martínez et al., 1996); Buenos Aires, ARG; Chaco, ARG; Corrientes, ARG; Santa Fé, ARG (Lunaschi & Drago, 2007);
	Opisthogonimus fonsecai	Precise location not available, BRA (Pinto et al., 2012)
	Opisthogonimus sp.	Capão do Leão, Rio Grande do Sul, BRA (present study)
	Styphlodora gili	Precise location not available, URY (Mañé-Garzón & Holcman-Spector, 1967); Capão do Leão, Rio Grande do Sul, BRA; Rio Grande, Rio Grande do Sul, BRA (present study)
	Styphlodora condita	Precise location not available, ARG (Lunaschi & Sutton, 1985; Poumarau, 1968 apud Fernandes & Kohn, 2014)
	Styphlodora sp. 2	Dom Pedrito, Rio Grande do Sul, BRA (present study)
	Heterodiplostomum lanceolatum	Precise location not available, ARG (Lunaschi & Sutton, 1985; Poumarau, 1968 apud Fernandes & Kohn, 2014)
	Catadiscus freitaslenti	Precise location not available, ARG (Lunaschi & Sutton, 1985; Poumarau, 1968 apud Fernandes & Kohn, 2014)
	Travtrema stenocotyle	Precise location not available, ARG (Lunaschi & Sutton, 1985; Poumarau, 1968 apud Fernandes & Kohn, 2014)

In this context, studies of diet and helminth fauna of snakes are complementary and contribute to the understanding of the biology of species and their role in ecosystems. Such studies generate important information that can be used in conservation programmes for the species and their habitats.

Acknowledgements 

Special thanks to Ricardo R. C. Silva, Marco Antonio A. Coimbra, José Eduardo F. Dornelles, and Núcleo de Reabilitação da Fauna Silvestre e Centro de Triagem de Animais Silvestres (NURFS/CETAS/UFPel) for their assistance. This work was supported by CAPES (Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento do Pessoal de Nível Superior) through of process 32/2010, and postdoctoral fellowship from Programa Nacional de Pós-doutorado (PNPD) at the Programa de Pós-graduação em Microbiologia e Parasitologia (PPGMPar/UFPel) to CSM, and CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico) through scientific initiation fellowship at the UFPel to JVP.

References

Amato, J. F. R., Boeger, W. A., & Amato, S. B. (1991). Coleta e Processamento de Parasitos do Pescado. Rio de Janeiro: Imprensa Universitária, UFRRJ. 

Artigas, P. T., & Perez, M. D. (1969). Sistemática dos Opisthogonimidae (Trematoda, Plagiorchoidea). Criação da família Bieriidae N. Fam. Memórias do Instituto Butantan, 34, 97–110. 

Artigas, P. T., Ruiz, J. M., & Leão, A. T. (1942). Trematódeos de ofídios. Liophistrema pulmonalis, n. g., n. sp.; Liophistreminae, n. subfam., Westella sulina, n. g., n. sp. (Plagiorchiidae). Memórias do Instituto Butantan, 16, 157–169.

Artigas, P. T., Ruiz, J. M., & Leão, A. T. (1943). Algumas notas sobre o gênero Opisthogonimus Luehe, 1900. Descrição de Opistogonimus serpentis sp. n., trematoide de ofídeo. Memórias do Instituto Butantan, 17, 47–59.

Balestrin, R. L., Di-Bernardo, M., & Moreno, A. G. (2007). Feeding ecology of the neotropical worm snake Atractus reticulatus in southern Brazil. Herpetological Journal, 17, 62–64.

Bellini, G. P., Giraudo, A. R., Arzamendia, V., & Etchepare, E. G. (2015). Temperate snake community in South America: is diet determined by phylogeny or ecology? Plos One, 10, e0123237. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123237

Bernarde, P. S. (2012). Anfíbios e répteis: Introdução ao estudo da herpetofauna brasileira. São Paulo: Anolis Books.

Bowman, A. (2014). Plagiorchidae. American Association of Veterinary Parasitologists (AAVP). Accessed November 06, 2019: https://www.aavp.org/wiki/trematodes-2/trematodes-
small-intestine/plagiorchidae/

Bush, A. O., Lafferty, K. D., Lotz, J. M., & Shostak, A. W. (1997). Parasitology meets ecology on its own terms: Margolis et al. revisited. Journal of Parasitology, 83, 575–583. https://doi.org/10.2307/3284227

Byrd, E. E., Parker, M. V., & Reiber, R. J. (1940). Taxonomic studies on the genus Styphdora Looss, 1899 (Trematoda: Styphlodorinae), with descriptions of four new species. Transactions of the American Microscopical Society, 59, 294–326. https://doi.org/10.2307/3222549

Corrêa, F. M. A., Paulino, R. C., Buononato, M. A., & Federsoni, P. A. (1990). Ochetosoma heterocoelium (Travassos, 1921) (Trematoda: Digenea: Ochetosomatidae) em novo hospedeiro. Memórias do Instituto Butantan, 52, 11–16.

Costa, H. C., & Bérnils, R. S. (2018). Répteis do Brasil e suas Unidades Federativas: Lista de espécies. Herpetologia Brasileira, 7, 11–57. 

Costa, H. C., Lopes, L. E., Marçal, B. F., & Zorzin, G. (2014). The reptile hunter’s menu: A review of the prey species of Laughing Falcons, Herpetotheres cachinnans (Aves: Falconiformes). North-Western Journal of Zoology, 10, 445–453. 

Dubois, G. (1988). Quelques Strigeoidea (Trematoda) récoltés au Paraguay par les expéditions du Muséum D’histoire Naturelle de Genève, au cours des années 1979, 1982 et 1985. Revue Suisse de Zoologie, 95, 521–532. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.part.79670

Fernandes, B. M. M., & Kohn, A. (2014). South American trematodes parasites of amphibians and reptiles. Rio de Janeiro: Oficina de Livros.

Freitas, J. F. T. (1956). Breve nota sobre Opisthogoniminae Travassos, 1928 e grupos afins (Trematoda, Plagiorchioidea). Revista Brasileira de Biologia, 16, 141–144.

Freitas, J. F. T. (1963). Revisão da família Mesocoeliidae Dollfus, 1933 (Trematoda). Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, 61, 177–311. https://doi.org/10.1590/s00
74-02761963000200001

Freitas, J. F. T., & Dobbin Jr., J. E. (1957). Sobre Travtrema stenocotyle (Cohn, 1902). Boletim do Museu Nacional, 170, 1–25.

Hamann, M. I. (1992). Catadiscus pomaceae sp. n. (Trematoda, Paramphistomatidae) from Pomacea canaliculata (Lamarck, 1801) (Prosobranchia, Ampullariidae). Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, 87, 9–14. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0074-02761992000100002

Hamann, M. I., & González, C. E. (2009). Larval Digenetic Trematodes in tadpoles of six amphibian species from Northeastern Argentina. Journal of Parasitology, 95, 623–62. https://doi.org/10.1645/GE-1738.1

Hamann, M. I., Kehr, A. I., & González, C. E. (2012). Community structure of helminth parasites of Leptodactylus bufonius (Anura: Leptodactylidae) from Northeastern Argentina. Zoological Studies, 51, 1454–1463. https://doi.org/11336/101652

Hartmann, P. A., & Marques, O. A. V. (2005). Diet and habitat use of two sympatric species of Philodryas (Colubridae) in south Brazil. Amphibia-Reptilia, 26, 25–31. https://doi.org/10.1163/1568538053693251

Holcman-Spector, B., & Mañé-Garzón, F. (1973). A new species of the genus Liophistrema Ruiz and Leão, 1942 (Digenea, Ophisthogonimidae). Neotropica, 19, 11–14. 

Jones, A. (2005). Family Diplodiscidae Cohn, 1904. En A. Jones, R. A. Bray, & D. I. Gibson (Eds.), Keys to the Trematoda, Vol. 2. London: CABI. https://doi.org/10.1079/
9780851995878.0319

Kehr, A. I., & Hamann, M. I. (2003). Ecological aspects of parasitism in the tadpole of Pseudis paradoxa from Argentina. Herpetological Review, 34, 336–341. http://doi.org/11336/59129

Lunaschi, L. I., & Drago, F. B. (2002). Primer registro de Catadiscus uruguayensis Freitas y Lent, 1939 (Digenea: Diplodiscidae) como parásito de reptiles. Neotropica, 48, 65–67.

Lunaschi, L. I., & Drago, F. B. (2007). Checklist of digenean parasites of amphibians and reptiles from Argentina. Zootaxa, 1476, 51–68. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.176772

Lunaschi, L. I., & Sutton, C. A. (1985). Trematodes de reptiles incorporados a la colección helmintológica del Museo de La Plata. Neotropica, 31, 69–81. 

Mañé-Garzón, F., & Alonso, A. (1976). Em nueva espécie de Digenea Strigeoidea. Heterodiplostomum helicopsis n. sp. del Instituto de la culebra de água Helicops carinicaudus (Wied, 1825). Revista de Biologia del Uruguay, 4, 85–91.

Mañé-Garzón, F., & Gortari, A. M. (1965). Sobre algunos trematodos de ofidios del Uruguay. Comunicaciones Zoologicas del Museo de Historia Natural de Montevideo, 107, 1–21. 

Mañé-Garzon, F., & Holcman-Spector, B. (1967). Styphlodora gili nov. sp. (Digenea) parásito de las vias urinárias de Bothrops alternata. Comunicaciones Zoologicas del Museo de Historia Natural de Montevideo, 9, 1–6. 

Marcogliese, D. J. (2004). Parasites: small players with crucial roles in the ecological theater. EcoHealth, 1, 151–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-004-0028-3

Marques, O. A. V., Eterovic, A., & Sazima, I. (2001). Serpentes da Mata Atlântica: guia ilustrado para a Serra do Mar. Ribeirão Preto: Holos. 

Martínez, F. A., Troiano, J. C., Binda, J. L., Selles, D. E., Jara, D., & Fescina, N. (1996). Trematodes of some ophidians of the northeast of Argentina. Cuadernos de Herpetologia, 9, 85–94.

Ostrowski-De Núñez, M. (1979). Ungewöhnlich Xiphidiocercariae aus Ampullaria canaliculata nebst Bemerkungen über Travtrema stenocotyle. Angewandte Parasitologie, 20, 46–52.

Overbeck, G. E., Boldrini, I. I., Carmo, M. R. B., Garcia, E. N., Moro, R. S., Pinto, C. E. et al. (2015). Fisionomia dos Campos. In V. P. Pillar, & Lange, O. (Eds.), Os campos do Sul. Porto Alegre: Rede Campos Sulinos – UFRGS. 

Pereira, C. (1929). Revisão do gênero Opisthogonimus (Trematoda). Revista do Museu Paulista, 16, 995–1014.

Pinto, H. A., Mati, V. L. T., & Melo, A. L. (2012). New hosts and localities for trematodes of snakes (Reptilia: Squamata) from Minas Gerais State, Southeastern Brazil. Comparative Parasitology, 79, 238–246. https://doi.org/10.1654/4548.1

Poumarau, E. M. C. (1968). Trematodes de ofídios de la Argentina. Revista Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales Bernardino Rivadavia, 1, 1–129.

Quintela, F. M., & Loebmann, D. (2009). Guia ilustrado: os répteis da região costeira do extremo sul do Brasil. Pelotas: USEB.

Quirino, T. F., Ferreira, A. J. M. G., Silva, M. C., Silva, R. J., Morais, D. H., & Ávila, R. W. (2018). New records of helminths in reptiles from five states of Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Biology, 78, 750–754. https://doi.org/10.1590/
1519-6984.175745

Rodrigues, H. O., Santos, E. (1974). Notas sobre dois helmintos parasitos de répteis. Atas da Sociedade de Biologia do Rio de Janeiro, 17, 55–58.

Ruiz, J. M., & Leão, A. T. (1942a). Notas helmintológicas: Três novas espécies de Opisthogonimus parasitas de ofídeos brasileiros (Trematoda: Plagiorchiidae). Memórias do Instituto Butantan, 16, 171–185.

Ruiz, J. M., & Leão, A. T. (1942b). Notas helmintológicas. 2. Algumas considerações em tôrno do gênero Leptophyllum Cohn, 1902 (Trematoda: Plagiorchiidae). Memórias do Instituto Butantan, 16, 187–195.

Ruiz, J. M., & Leão, A. T. (1943). Notas helmintológicas III. Nova espécie de trematóide do gênero Infidum Travassos, 1916 (Dicrocoellidae) parasito de ofídeo brasileiro. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, 16, 203–207.

Ruiz, J. M., & Rangel, J. M. (1954). Estrigêidas de répteis brasileiros (Trematoda: Strigeata). Memórias do Instituto Butantan, 26, 257–278.

Sey, O. (1983). Reconstruction of the systematics of the family Diplodiscidae Skrjabin, 1949 (Trematoda: Paramphistomata). Parasitologia Hungarica, 16, 63–89. 

Thaler, R., Folly, H., Galvão, C., & da Silva, L. A. (2018). First predation report of Leptodactylus chaquensis (Anura, Leptodactylidae) by Helicops infrataeniatus (Squamata, Dipsadidae) and new records for this water snake. Herpetology Notes, 11, 539–541. 

Tkach, V. V. (2008a). Family Opisthogonimidae Travassos, 1928. In R. A. Bray, D. I. Gibson, & A. Jones (Eds.), Keys of the Trematoda, Vol. 3. London: CABI. https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851995885.0401

Tkach, V. V. (2008b). Family Plagiorchiidae Lühe, 1901. In R. A. Bray, D. I. Gibson, & A. Jones (Eds.), Keys of the Trematoda. Vol. 3. London: CABI. https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851995885.0295

Travassos, L. (1944). Revisão da família Dicrocoeliidae Odhner, 1910. Monografia Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. Brazil.

Uetz, P., Freed, P., & Hošek, J. (Eds.). (2021). The Reptile Database. Accessed July 09, 2021: http://www.reptile-data
base.org

Vasconcelos-Filho, F. S. L., Rocha-e-Silva, R. C., Vasconcelos, R. H., Neto, J. O., Silveira, J. A. M., de Morais, G. B.
et al. (2015). Natural history and biological aspects of Dipsadidae snakes: P. olfersii, P. patagoniensis and P. nattereri. Revista Brasileira de Higiene e Sanidade
Animal, 9, 386–399. http://doi.org/10.5935/1981-2965.2015
0036