Biogeographic analysis of the American genus Echeandia (Agavoideae: Asparagaceae)

Análisis biogeográfico del género americano Echeandia (Agavoideae: Asparagaceae)

Asparagaceae is the most diverse family of Asparagales. It includes 153 genera and 2,290-2,650 species distributed worldwide except in the Arctic (APG IV, 2016; Bogler et al., 2006; Pires et al., 2006). Chase et al. (2009) divided Asparagaceae into 7 subfamilies: Agavoideae, Aphyllanthoideae, Asparagoideae, Brodiaeoideae, Lomandroideae, Nolinoideae, and Scilloideae. This classification was further supported by a phylogenetic analysis based on DNA sequences from 4 plastid genes (Chen et al., 2013). Agavoideae has 30 genera with petaloid flowers and rosulate leaves (McKain et al., 2016). The genera Agave L. sensu stricto, Manfreda Salisb., Polianthes L., Yucca L. and Echeandia Ortega diversified in North America (Jiménez-Barron et al., 2020; McKain et al., 2016).

Echeandia is one of the most diverse genera in Agavoideae. It includes 85 species within the subgenera Echeandia and Mscavea Cruden (Rodríguez & Ortiz-Brunel, 2019). The former includes plants with flowers opening early in the morning, generally with elliptic white or yellow tepals, and ellipsoidal fruits. Most species grow above 1,500 m of elevation. In contrast, plants in the subgenus Mscavea have flowers which open near noon or later, most of them have narrowly elliptic white tepals and globose fruits. The plants grow below 1,500 m of elevation (Fig. 1).

Echeandia is endemic to the American continent and Mexico is the center of diversification (Cruden, 2009; Rodríguez & Castro-Castro, 2005; Rodríguez & Ortiz-Brunel, 2019). The distribution of Echeandia extends across the Nearctic and Neotropical biogeographic regions proposed by Wallace (1876). The limits of these regions are located in the mountains of Mexico, Guatemala, and Honduras (Wallace 1876). Halffter (1964) named this area as the Mexican Transition Zone (MTZ). Based on Morrone et al. (2017), the MTZ includes the Sierra Madre Occidental (SMOc), the Sierra Madre Oriental (SMOr), the Transmexican Volcanic Belt (TVB), the Sierra Madre del Sur (SMS), and the Chiapas Highlands (CH) provinces. 

Centers of angiosperm species richness are located in mountainous tropical regions, such as the MTZ (Barthlott et al., 2005). In Mexico, the greatest number of angiosperm species occurs in the temperate forests in some areas of the TVB, the SMS, and the CH (Cruz-Cárdenas et al., 2013; Villaseñor & Ortiz, 2014; Rodríguez et al., 2018). Geophyte diversity is concentrated along the TVB and SMS (Cuéllar-Martínez & Sosa, 2016). Total endemism in the Mexican flora ranges from 50 to 52% (Rzedowski, 2019; Villaseñor, 2016; Villaseñor & Ortiz, 2014). Its distribution is uneven but many centers have been located along the MTZ (Alcántara & Paniagua, 2007; Salinas-Rodríguez et al., 2017; Santiago-Alvarado et al., 2016; Sosa & de Nova, 2012; Torres-Miranda et al., 2013; Villaseñor & Ortiz, 2007). Also, the MTZ has been identified as the center of diversification of some angiosperm lineages such as Bletia Ruiz & Pav. (Sosa et al., 2016), Solanum sect. Petota Dumort. (Hijmans & Spooner, 2001), Phaseolus L. (Delgado-Salinas et al., 2006), Cosmos Cav. (Vargas-Amado et al., 2013), Dioon Lindl. (Gutiérrez-Ortega et al., 2018), Quercus L. (Hipp et al., 2018), Dahlia Cav. (Carrasco-Ortiz et al., 2019; Sánchez-Chávez et al., 2019), Pinus L. (Gernandt & Pérez-de la Rosa, 2014), and the tribe Tigridieae (Munguía-Lino et al., 2015). Based on these facts, we expect that the MTZ should host the greatest species richness and endemism of Echeandia. Our aims were to analyze the spatial distribution of species richness and endemism of this genus.

Table 1

Spatial distribution of species richness in Echeandia. Department, Province or State abbreviations: Ags, Aguascalientes; Ahua, Ahuachapán; Ala, Alajuela; AV, Alta Verapaz; BV, Baja Verapaz; Camp, Campeche; Car, Carabobo; CDMX, Ciudad de México; Chih, Chihuahua; Chiq, Chiquimula; Chis, Chiapas; Chon, Chontales; Coah, Coahuila; Col, Colima; Dgo, Durango; Est, Estelí; FM, Francisco Morazán; Gro, Guerrero; Gto, Guanajuato; Gua, Guanacaste; Guat, Guatemala; Hgo, Hidalgo; Huan, Huancavelica; Hue, Huehuetenango; Jal, Jalisco; Jala, Jalapa; Lem, Lempira; Mag, Magdalena; Mat, Matagalpa; Mex, Estado de México; Mich, Michoacán; Mor, Morelos; Nay, Nayarit; NL, Nuevo León; Oax, Oaxaca; Oco, Ocotepeque; Por, Portuguesa; Pue, Puebla; Punt, Puntarenas; QR, Quintana Roo; Qro, Querétaro; Sin, Sinaloa; SLP, San Luis Potosí; SM, San Marcos; Son, Sonora; SS, San Salvador; Tamps, Tamaulipas; Tlax, Tlaxcala; Tot, Totonicapán; Ver, Veracruz; Yuc, Yucatán; Zac, Zacatecas. Biogeographic provinces abbreviations: BB, Balsas Basin; CH, Chiapas Highlands; CHIH, Chihuahuan Desert; PL, Pacific Lowlands; SMOc, Sierra Madre Occidental; SMOr, Sierra Madre Oriental; SMS, Sierra Madre del Sur; TAMPS, Tamaulipas; TVB, Transmexican Volcanic Belt; VER, Veracruzan; YP, Yucatán Peninsula.

Species	Country	Department, province or state	Biogeographic province
1. E. albiflora M.Martens & Galeotti	Mexico	Pue, Ver	TVB, VER
2. E. altipratensis Cruden	Guatemala	Hue, SM, Tot	CH
	Mexico	Chis
3. E. atoyacana Cruden	Mexico	Gro, Mex	BB, PL
4. E. attenuata Cruden	Mexico	Dgo, Sin	PL, SMOc
5. E. bolivarensis Cruden	Venezuela	Bolívar	Pantepui
6. E. breedlovei Cruden	Mexico	Chis, Oax	PL, VER
7. E. campechiana Cruden	Mexico	Camp, Yuc	YP
8. E. chandleri (Greenm. & C.H.Thomps.) Cruden	Mexico,	Coah, NL, Tamps,	CHIH, Grasslands, SMOr
	USA	Texas
9. E. chiapensis Cruden	Mexico	Chis, Oax	AC, PL, VER
10. E. ciliata (Kunth) Cruden	Peru	Cajamarca	Cauca, Puna, Yungas
11. E. coalcomanensis Cruden	Mexico	Jal, Mich, Nay	SMS, TVB
12. E. confertiflora Cruden	Mexico	Oax	BB
13. E. conzattii Cruden	Mexico	Gro, Oax	BB, SMS, TVB
14. E. crudeniana Aarón Rodr.	Mexico	Nay	PL
15. E. denticulata Cruden	Colombia,	Boyacá, Cundinamarca	Guajira, Magdalena, Paramo
	Venezuela	Mérida
16. E. drepanoides (Greenm.) Cruden	Mexico	Oax	BB, SMS
17. E. durangensis (Greenm.) Cruden	Mexico	Ags, CDMX, Chih, Dgo, Gto, Hgo, Jal, Mex, Mich, Mor, NL, Qro, SLP, Ver, Zac	CHIH, PL, SMOc, SMOr, TVB
18. E. echeandioides (Schltdl.) Cruden	Mexico	CDMX, Gro, Mex, Mich, Mor, Oax, Pue	BB, SMS, TVB
19. E. elegans Cruden	Mexico	Gro, Mor	BB, SMS
20. E. falcata Cruden	Mexico	Gto, Mich, Qro	CHIH, SMOr
21. E. flavescens (Schult. & Schult.f.) Cruden	Mexico	Ags, CDMX, Chih, Coah, Dgo, Gto, Hgo, Jal, Mex, Mich, NL, Oax, Pue, Qro, SLP, Son, Tlax, Ver, Zac	BB, CHIH, Chihuahuan, Grasslands, Madrean Cordillera, PL, Rocky Mountains, SMOc, SMOr, SMS, Sonoran, TAMPS, TVB
	USA	Arizona, New Mexico, Texas
22. E. flexuosa Greenm.	Mexico	Jal, Gto, Mich, Nay, Qro, Zac	CHIH, PL, SMOc, TVB
Table 1. Continued
Species	Country	Department, province or state	Biogeographic province
23. E. formosa (Weath.) Cruden	Honduras	FM	CH, SMS
	Mexico	Chis, Oax
24. E. gentryi Cruden	Mexico	Dgo, Jal, Nay, Sin, Zac	PL, SMOc, TVB
25. E. gracilis Cruden	Mexico	CDMX, Hgo, Mex, Mor, Pue	SMOr, TVB
26. E. graminea M.Martens & Galeotti	Mexico	Oax, Pue, Ver	BB, PL, SMS, TVB
27. E. grandiflora Cruden	Mexico	Oax	PL, SMS
28. E. hallbergii Cruden	Mexico	Oax	SMS
29. E. herrerae (Killip) Cruden	Peru	Apurimac, Cuzco, Huan, Junín	Rondônia, Ucayali, Yungas
30. E. hintonii Cruden	Mexico	Gro	BB, SMS
31. E. hirticaulis Cruden	Mexico	Gro, Mex, Mich, Oax	BB, SMS, TVB
32. E. imbricata Cruden	Mexico	Gro, Jal, Mich, Mor	BB, PL, SMS, TVB
33. E. jaliscensis Aarón Rodr. & Brunel	Mexico	Jal	TVB
34. E. lehmannii (Baker) Marais & Reilly	Ecuador	Pichincha	Cauca
35. E. leucantha Klotzsch	Colombia	Mag	CH, Guajira, Guatuso-Talamanca, PL, Puntarenas-Chiriquí, Savanna, Venezuelan
	Costa Rica	Ala, Gua, Punt
	Honduras	FM
	Nicaragua	Chon, Est, Mat
	Venezuela	Car, Por, Tovar, Zulia
36. E. llanicola Cruden	Mexico	Oax	SMS
37. E. longifolia (Weath.) Cruden	Mexico	Oax	SMS
38. E. longipedicellata Cruden	Guatemala	Hue	CH, SMOc, SMS, TVB
	Mexico	Chis, Dgo, Gro, Jal, Mex, Mich, Mor, Oax, Pue, Tlax, Ver
39. E. luteola Cruden	Belize	Cayo	VER, YP
	Mexico	Camp, QR, Yuc
40. E. macrophylla Rose ex Weath.	Mexico	SLP	SMOr
41. E. magnifica López-Ferr., Espejo & Ceja	Mexico	Gro	BB, SMS
42. E. matudae Cruden	El Salvador	Santa Ana, SS	CH, PL, SMS, VER
	Guatemala	AV, Hue, Jala
	Mexico	Chis, Oax
43. E. mcvaughii Cruden	Mexico	Jal, Nay	CHIH, PL, SMS, TVB
44. E. mexiae Cruden	Mexico	Gro, Oax	BB, SMS, TVB
45. E. mexicana Cruden	Mexico	CDMX, Gto, Hgo, Jal, Mex, Mich, Mor, Nay, Oax, Pue, Qro, SLP, Ver	BB, CHIH, PL, SMOc, SMOr, TVB
46. E. michoacensis (Poelln.) Cruden	Mexico	Col, Gto, Mich	PL, SMOr, SMS, TVB
47. E. mirandae Cruden	Mexico	Oax, Pue	BB, SMS
48. E. molinae Cruden	Guatemala	BV	CH
49. E. montealbanensis Cruden	Mexico	Oax	BB, PL, SMS
Table 1. Continued
Species	Country	Department, province or state	Biogeographic province
50. E. nana (Baker) Cruden	Mexico	CDMX, Gto, Hgo, Jal, Mex, Mich, Mor, Pue, Qro, SLP, Tlax, Ver	CHIH, SMOr, TVB
51. E. nayaritensis Cruden	Mexico	Nay, Sin	PL
52. E. novogaliciana Aarón Rodr. & Ortiz-Cat.	Mexico	Dgo, Nay, Zac	CHIH, SMOc
53. E. oaxacana Cruden	Mexico	Oax	BB, PL, SMS
54. E. occidentalis Cruden	Mexico	Jal, Mich, Nay, Sin, Zac	BB, CHIH, PL, SMOc, TVB
55. E. palmeri Cruden	Mexico	Chih, Dgo, Son, Zac	CHIH, SMOc
56. E. paniculata Rose	Mexico	CDMX, Gro, Gto, Hgo, Jal, Mex, Mich, Mor, Oax, Pue, Qro, SLP, Ver, Zac	BB, CHIH, PL, SMOc, SMOr, TVB
57. E. parva Cruden	Mexico	Mor, Oax, Pue	BB
58. E. parvicapsulata Cruden	Mexico	Col, Jal, Nay, Sin	PL, SMS
59. E. parviflora Baker	Guatemala	Chiq	BB, CH, CHIH, SMS, TVB, VER
	Mexico	Chis, Col, Gro, Jal, Mex, Mor, Oax, Pue, Ver
60. E. petenensis Cruden	Belize	Cayo, Toledo	VER, YP
	Guatemala	Petén
	Mexico	Camp
61. E. pihuamensis Cruden	Mexico	Col, Jal	PL
62. E. pittieri Cruden	Colombia	Mag, Valle del Cauca	Guajira, Magdalena, Puntarenas-Chiriquí
	Panama	Chiriquí
63. E. platyphylla (Greenm.) Cruden	Mexico	Pue	BB
64. E. pringlei Greenm.	Mexico	Jal, Nay	TVB
65. E. pseudopetiolata Cruden	Mexico	Gro	SMS
66. E. pseudoreflexa Cruden	Mexico	Chis	CH, VER
67. E. ramosissima (C.Presl) Cruden	Mexico	Chih, Col, Dgo, Gro, Jal, Mex, Mich, Mor Nay, Sin, Son	BB, CHIH, PL, SMOc, TVB
68. E. reflexa (Cav.) Rose	Mexico	Ags, CDMX, Chis, Gto, Hgo, Jal, Mich, NL., Oax, Pue, Qro, SLP, Tamps, Ver	BB, CH, CHIH, PL, SMOc, SMOr, TVB, VER
69. E. robusta Cruden	Mexico	Jal	PL, SMS, TVB
70. E. sanmiguelensis Cruden	Mexico	Gto	CHIH
71. E. scabrella (Benth.) Cruden	Mexico	Ags, Coah, Chih, Dgo, Gto, Jal, Mich, Nay, Zac	CHIH, PL, SMOc, TVB
72. E. sinaloensis Cruden	Mexico	Jal, Nay, Sin	PL, TVB
73. E. skinneri (Baker) Cruden	El Salvador	La Libertad, Santa Ana	CH, PL, VER
	Guatemala	AV
	Honduras	Chol
	Mexico	Chis
74. E. smithii Cruden	Mexico	Oax	SMS
Table 1. Continued
Species	Country	Department, province or state	Biogeographic province
75. E. tamaulipensis Cruden	Mexico	Tamps	TAMPS, VER
76. E. taxacana Cruden	Mexico	Gro, Mex, Mor, Oax	BB, SMS, TVB
77. E. tenuifolia Cruden	Mexico	Oax	BB, SMS
78. E. tenuis (Weath.) Cruden	Mexico	Gro, Mor, Oax	BB, SMS, TVB
79. E. texensis Cruden	USA	Texas	Grasslands
80. E. udipratensis Cruden	Mexico	Jal	TVB
81. E. vaginata Cruden	Mexico	Oax	BB, SMS
82. E. venusta Woodson	Panama	Chiriquí	Puntarenas-Chiriquí
83. E. vestita (Baker) Cruden	Guatemala	Quiché	BB, CH, CHIH, SMS, TVB
	Mexico	Chis, Jal, Mich, Oax, Pue, Tlax, Ver
84. E. weberbaueri (Poelln.) Cruden	Peru	Huan	Rondônia, Yungas
85. E. williamsii Cruden	El Salvador	Ahua	CH, PL, VER
	Guatemala	AV, BV, Chiq, Guat, Hue, Jala
	Honduras	Lem, Oco
	Mexico	Chis

 

Materials and methods

We compiled taxonomic, geographic, ecological, and curatorial data from different sources to generate a database. We reviewed the Mexican herbaria CICY, CIIDIR, ENCB, HGOM, IBUG, IEB, MEXU, SLPM, UAT, UAMIZ, XAL, and ZEA. Also, we searched for the available electronic records of collections in ARIZ, ASC, ASU, BRIT, COL, MO, NMC, RENO, RM, SJNM, and SNM herbaria (Thiers, 2020). We added records from Central and Southern America contained at the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF, 2018) and included all the locations cited in Cruden (1981, 1986, 1987, 1989, 1993, 1994, 1999, 2009), Cruden and McVaugh (1989), López-Ferrari and Espejo-Serna (1995), López-Ferrari et al. (2002), Rodríguez and Ortiz-Catedral (2013), and Rodríguez and Ortiz-Brunel (2019).

We corroborated all taxonomic identifications and corrected some herbarium specimens if necessary. When a record lacked geographic coordinates but had a detailed written description of the locality, we manually georeferenced it using Google Earth Pro (Google, 2018) and the Mexican localities database of INEGI (2010). In other words, we followed the Spatial Analysis Georeferencing Accuracy (SAGA) protocol (Bloom et al., 2017). It maximized the accuracy of the inferred geographic coordinates. For the same record, the elevation was obtained from a digital model of elevation, using QGIS 2.14.3 (QGIS Development Team, 2018). Duplicated and doubtful entries were deleted. The database is available upon request.

The species richness was quantified by political limits, geographical criteria, biogeographic provinces and a cell grid. For the political limits, we used the Continental level of the World Geographical Scheme for Recording Plant Distributions (Brummitt, 2001), the political divisions of the countries, and the state divisions of Mexico (INEGI, 2010). Then, we determined the species richness by latitude, longitude, and elevation. We used the biogeographic regionalization proposal of Udvardy (1975) for the USA. But for Mexico and Latin America, we combined the proposals of Morrone (2014) and Morrone et al. (2017). An adequate cell size was estimated from the total distance between extreme data points (MxD) with DIVA-GIS 4.2 program (Hijmans et al., 2004). Then, we followed the method established by Willis et al. (2003) and modified by Suárez-Mota and Villaseñor (2011) to obtain a 45 × 45 km cell size. The grid analysis was performed with DIVA-GIS 4.2 (Hijmans et al., 2004).

Endemism was estimated by political limits and biogeographic provinces using the same parameters as species richness. Centers of endemism were identified using weighted endemism (WE) and corrected weighted endemism (CWE) parameters. The level of endemism within a cell, based on the species occurring in it, was estimated by the WE (Laffan & Crisp, 2003). In contrast, CWE calculates endemism based on the proportion of endemics of the cell in relation to its species richness. Generally, cells with more species should contain more endemics (Laffan & Crisp, 2003). We used the Biodiverse program to estimate both parameters (Laffan et al., 2010). Cell size was the same for the species richness and endemism analyses.

Results

The database contained 2,078 records and 85 species of Echeandia (Table 1). There were 1,846 entries for Mexico, 125 for the USA, 60 for South America and 45 for Central America (Fig. 2). We georeferenced 46.5% of the records. The number of records per species varied from 1 in Echeandia longifolia (Weath.) Cruden, E. macrophylla Rose ex Weath., E. molinae Cruden, and E. venusta Woodson to 322 in E. flavescens (Schult. & Schult.f.) Cruden. On average, each species had 24 records.

With 74 species, Mexico had the highest species richness of Echeandia followed by Guatemala with 9, and then Honduras with 4. The USA, El Salvador, Venezuela, Colombia, and Peru had 3 species each. Two species were registered for both Belize and Panama while Nicaragua, Costa Rica, and Ecuador, each had 1 (Table 1). Within Mexico, the states of Oaxaca (31), Jalisco (24), and Guerrero (16) had the greatest number of species.

Latitudinally, Echeandia presented its greatest diversity between 17° and 21° N (Fig. 3A). The genus was markedly diverse at 97°, 99°, and 103° W (Fig. 3B). At one extreme, Echeandia campechiana Cruden, E. crudeniana Aarón Rodr., E. luteola Cruden, and E. texensis Cruden grew at sea level in Mexico and the USA. In contrast, E. herrerae (Killip) Cruden inhabited the highest elevational limit of the genus at 4,121 m, in Peru. In Central America, E. altipratensis Cruden reached 3,550 m, in Guatemala. Meanwhile, in Mexico E. durangensis (Greenm.) Cruden and E. longipedicellata Cruden were found at 3,300 m. However, most species were collected between 1,500 and 2,500 m of elevation (Fig. 3C).

Echeandia was documented in 29 of the 70 biogeographic provinces of Latin America and in 5 out of 16 in the USA (Table 1). The spatial distribution was heterogeneous but concentrated in Mexico. The SMS had 39 species. The Pacific Lowlands (PL) and the TVB had 32, each. The Balsas Basin (BB), the Chihuahuan Desert (CHIH), and the SMOc, had 29, 18, and 15, respectively. Then, the CH and Veracruzan provinces had 12, each. Lastly, the SMOr recorded 11 species. Adding numbers up, the MTZ contained 61 species whereas the Neotropic and the Nearctic had 63 and 19 species, individually.

The grid analysis revealed 4 cells with high species richness (Fig. 4A). Cell 1 had 12 species and was located in the limits among Ciudad de México, Estado de México, and the state of Morelos. Cells 2, 3, and 4 contained 11 species each. Cell 2 occurred in the Oaxaca-Puebla state border, while cells 3 and 4 were situated in the confluence of the Central Valleys with the southern and northern mountains in Oaxaca (Fig. 4B). All cells with more than 3 species were in Mexico. In Central America, one cell in Guatemala had 3 species. El Salvador, Honduras, and Panama had cells with 2 species, while the rest of Central and all South America presented only 1 species per cell (Fig. 4A).

Among countries, the number of endemic species was contrasting (Table 1). For Mexico, 63 were reported followed by Peru with 3. Ecuador, the USA, Guatemala, Panama, and Venezuela, each had 1. In Mexico, Oaxaca was the state with the highest number of endemic species, including Echeandia confertiflora Cruden, E. drepanoides (Greenm.) Cruden, E. grandiflora Cruden, E. hallbergii Cruden, E. llanicola Cruden, E. longifolia, E. montealbanensis Cruden, E. oaxacana Cruden, E. smithii Cruden, E. tenuifolia Cruden, and E. vaginata Cruden. Echeandia hintonii Cruden, E. magnifica López-Ferr., Espejo & Ceja, and E. pseudopetiolata Cruden grew only in Guerrero while E. jaliscensis Aarón Rodr. & Brunel, E. robusta Cruden, and E. udipratensis Cruden were found only in Jalisco (Table 1).

Based on biogeographic provinces, Echeandia hallbergii, E. llanicola, E. longifolia, E. pseudopetiolata, and E. smithii determined the SMS to be the province with the highest number of endemic species. Meanwhile, E. confertiflora, E. parva Cruden, and E. platyphylla (Greenm.) Cruden were endemic to the BB, while E. crudeniana, E. nayaritensis Cruden, and E. pihuamensis Cruden were exclusive to the PL. The TVB and the CH had 2 endemics each. Provinces with 1 endemic species included Grasslands, CHIH, SMOr, Yucatán Peninsula (YP), Puntarenas-Chiriquí, Pantepui, and Cauca (Table 1).

The WE analysis revealed 5 cells with the highest values (2.88 to 3.58), all located in Mexico. Cell 1 fell in Guerrero but cells 2, 3, 4, and 5 situated in Oaxaca. In Central and South America, the cell values varied from 0.01 to 1.44 (Fig. 5A). Cells with 1.45 to 2.15 values were identified in Ciudad de México, Jalisco, Estado de México, Morelos, Puebla, and Querétaro (Fig. 5B). Even though the CWE analysis revealed 5 cells with a value of 1, these had different distribution (Fig. 6). Cell 1 located in Mexico, cells 2 and 3 in Venezuela, cell 4 in Ecuador, and cell 5 in Peru. Cells with values between 0.6 and 0.8 were observed in Panama and Peru. Finally, Mexico, the USA, Guatemala, Colombia, and Peru hosted cells with 0.4 to 0.6 values.

Discussion

The database contained 2,078 records and out of these, we georeferenced 966 of them (46.5%). Even though several publications failed to state how or if the data were georeferenced, this proportion compares with similar analyses. For instance, Munguía-Lino et al. (2015) georeferenced 47% of the occurrence points in the tribe Tigridieae (Iridaceae) of North America and Carrasco-Ortiz et al. (2019) did the same for 61% of the records in Dahlia (Asteraceae). In Sedum (Crassulaceae) from the Sierra Madre del Sur (Mexico), Aragón-Parada et al. (2019) georeferenced 91% of the geographical data. The confidence of our results depended on the taxonomic identification and the quality of geographic coordinates included the estimated ones. We followed the SAGA protocol and according with Bloom et al. (2017), this method outpaced any other georeferencing scheme.

In biogeography, the uneven distribution of species richness makes a striking pattern. Even though political divisions do not have a biological significance, they are important for conservation decisions (Whittaker et al., 2005). Mexico is the center of diversification of many lineages of Agavoideae such as Agave L. sensu stricto, Manfreda Salisb., Polianthes L., and Yucca L. (Castro-Castro et al., 2016; Castro-Castro et al., 2018; García-Mendoza, 2002; García-Mendoza, 2011; Good-Avila et al., 2006; Jiménez-Barron et al., 2020). The highest species richness of Agavoideae is concentrated in Jalisco and Oaxaca (Castro-Castro, 2017; García-Mendoza, 2004). Echeandia followed a similar pattern.

As botanical exploration continues in Mexico, the number of species increases, including those in Echeandia. Espejo-Serna and López-Ferrari (1993) report 51 species and Cruden (2009) lists 59. Rodríguez and Ortiz-Catedral (2013) mention 69, while Villaseñor (2016) indicates the presence of 68 species. We have documented 74 species, adding the presence of E. altipratensis, E. petenensis Cruden, and E. williamsii Cruden within the Mexican territory. Also, we have included the recently described E. jaliscensis (Rodríguez & Ortiz-Brunel, 2019). Most likely, future botanical exploration will lead into the discovery of new species for the genus.

Plant species richness increases towards the equator. However, within the tropics, mountainous zones show the highest values (Barthlott et al., 2005; Ulloa-Ulloa et al., 2017). The spatial distribution of Echeandia coincided with these patterns. Echeandia species richness concentrated between 17° and 21° N and from 1,500 to 2,500 m of elevation. These ranges corresponded to the highlands of Oaxaca, Estado de México, and Morelos. The latitudinal and elevational patterns of Echeandia were similar to those of tribe Tigridieae (Iridaceae) (Munguía-Lino et al., 2015) and Solanum section Petota (Solanaceae) (Hijmans & Spooner, 2001). Also, Echeandia was markedly diverse at 97°, 99°, and 103° W, which corresponded to some areas of the SMS and the TVB. Latitudinal and elevational ranges with more species of Echeandia corresponded to the range of the pine-oak forest. Villaseñor and Ortiz (2014) identify this vegetation type as home of the largest angiosperm diversity in Mexico.

The highest diversity of Echeandia was concentrated along the MTZ, particularly in the SMS and TVB. Conversely, geophyte monocotyledons have their highest diversity along the TVB and the SMS (Cuéllar-Martínez & Sosa, 2016). Dahlia (Carrasco-Ortiz et al., 2019) and Echeandia shared the same area of species richness in the SMS. Additionally, we identified another pattern of Echeandia species richness.

Table 2. Species in the highest valued cells of the weighted endemism analysis.

Cell	Present	Endemic
1	Echeandia hintonii, E. magnifica, E. parviflora, E. pseudopetiolata, E. taxacana	E. pseudopetiolata
2	Echeandia confertiflora, E. echeandioides, E. mexiae, E. mexicana, E. montealbanensis, E. parva, E. parviflora, E. reflexa, E. taxacana, E. tenuifolia, E. vestita	E. confertiflora
3	Echeandia conzatti, E. echeandioides, E. hallbergii, E. mexicana, E. smithii, E. vaginata, E. vestita
4	Echeandia drepanoides, E. echeandioides, E. formosa, E. hallbergii, E. llanicola, E. longipedicellata, E. matudae, E. mexicana, E. montealbanensis, E. smithii, E. vestita	E. llanicola
5	Echeandia drepanoides, E. echeandioides, E. flavescens, E. hallbergii, E. matudae, E. montealbanensis, E. parviflora, E. reflexa, E. smithii, E. vaginata, E. vestita

 

Several species of Echeandia were located at the limits of the MTZ and the Neotropical region. These areas located between the pine-oak forest and the tropical deciduous forest. For example, E. conzattii Cruden, E. echeandioides (Schltdl.) Cruden, E. elegans Cruden, E. hintonii, E. hirticaulis Cruden, E. magnifica, E. mexiae Cruden, E. mirandae Cruden, E. taxacana Cruden, E. tenuifolia, E. tenuis (Weath.) Cruden, and E. vaginata occurred in the boundaries between the TVB or the SMS and the BB. The other case was observed along the PL. This province extends from southern Sonora to Nicaragua and has the widest latitudinal range (Morrone, 2014). At some points, it converges with the SMOc, the TVB, the SMS, and the CH. The distribution of E. attenuata Cruden, E. gentryi Cruden, E. grandiflora, E. mcvaughii Cruden, E. parvicapsulata Cruden, E. robusta, and E. sinaloensis Cruden included the PL and the MTZ. This evidence explains the high number of species observed in the PL and the BB.

A similar pattern was identified along the boundaries between the MTZ and the Nearctic region. The CHIH registered 18 species (Table 1). The distribution of some species of the SMOc, the SMOr, and the TVB extended to the vicinity of the CHIH. In other words, species of the temperate forest in the MTZ stretched their distribution to the mountains with dry conditions of the CHIH. This pattern was not observed with other provinces of the Nearctic. The Tamaulipas and the Sonoran Desert provinces have contact with the SMOr and the SMOc, respectively. However, only 4 and 1 species were registered for each province. Plains and low sierras with mesquite-grassland and desert cover both provinces (Ferrusquía-Villafranca, 1993; Leopold, 1950; Phillips & Wentworth, 2000; Rzedowski, 1986). It has been observed that topographic complex areas show a higher biodiversity in comparison with adjacent lowlands (Badgley et al., 2017). Echeandia had low species richness in provinces with lowlands covered by mesquite-grassland and desert.

The geographical distribution of Echeandia included the MTZ, the South American Transition Zone (STZ), the Neotropic, and the Nearctic. With 63 species, the Neotropic had the highest number of species but its territorial extension is also several times larger than the MTZ. Furthermore, most species registered in the Neotropic were recorded in the provinces situated next to the MTZ in Mexico. With some exceptions, Darlington (1957) says that transition zones have poor biodiversity. At the STZ and with 2 species recorded, Echeandia supports his observation, but the MTZ represents the contrary. Good-Avila et al. (2006) show evidence for a sister group relationship between the Anthericeae and Agavaceae clades. They separated from each other about 30 to 35 Mya. Further, Agave sensu lato originated 8-10 Mya. Within Agave sensu lato, Jiménez-Barron et al. (2020) show data supporting 2 recent diversification events at 2.68 and 6.18 Mya. Both Agave s.l. and Echeandia have a similar pattern of species richness distribution. It follows that Mexico represents the center of origin and diversification of Echeandia with a subsequent dispersal to the south. This observations could explain the low species richness in Central and South America but needs further evaluation based on a robust phylogenetic hypothesis.

With 12 species, the richest cell was located at the point where the state borders of Morelos, Estado de México, and Ciudad de México coincide. This pattern was very similar to those of the Mexican geophytes (Sosa & Loera, 2017) and the tribe Tigridieae (Munguía-Lino et al., 2015). Two cells, with 11 species each, were situated in Oaxaca at the limits between the SMS and the BB, similar to the case of Dahlia (Carrasco-Ortiz et al., 2019). Three out of 4 cells with the highest species richness were located in the MTZ but included portions of the BB. The remaining cell fell mostly in the BB but overlapped a little with the SMS (Fig. 7). This implies the presence of the tropical deciduous forest and the pine-oak forest in the 4 cells. The convergence of 2 biogeographic provinces and therefore, of 2 vegetation types, could explain the high number of species in these cells.

The endemic vascular flora of Mexico varies from 49.8% (Villaseñor, 2016) to 52.5% (Ulloa-Ulloa et al., 2017). Espejo-Serna (2012) estimates that 84.6% of the species of Echeandia are endemic to the country, which coincides with the 85.1% obtained in this work. Both estimates are greater than the global Mexican values. Therefore, Echeandia is a good surrogate of the endemic flora of Mexico.

The highest species richness and endemism of Echeandia were concentrated in the SMS. It had 39 species and 5 of them were endemic to the province. It also held the 5 cells with the highest values recovered by the WE analysis (Fig. 5, Table 2). However, endemism in the SMS was unevenly distributed. Based on endemism patterns, the SMS is divided in 3 subprovinces and 5 districts (Santiago-Alvarado et al., 2016; Morrone, 2017). The endemism of Echeandia was greater in the Eastern Sierra Madre del Sur subprovince. Cell 1 located in Guerrero and E. pseudopetiolata defined it. This zone was previously identified as the Sierra Madre del Sur Guerrerense district (Santiago-Alvarado et al., 2016). The 4 remaining cells occurred in Oaxaca, all of them in the Sierra Madre del Sur Oaxaqueña district (Santiago-Alvarado et al., 2016). Echeandia confertiflora defined cell 2 while E. llanicola was restricted to the cell 4. Cells 3 and 5 had no strict endemics but the species contributing to their values are listed in Table 2. These cells of Oaxaca were identified as endemism areas by Rodríguez et al. (2018) and Aragón-Parada et al. (2019).

Correspondingly, the CWE recovered 5 cells with a value of 1 and a single strict endemic (Fig. 6). Cell 1 placed in Mexico and was defined by the presence of Echeandia crudeniana, known only from the type locality in Punta Mita Peninsula, Bahía de Banderas, Nayarit (Rodríguez & Ortiz-Catedral, 2013). The other 4 cells pertained to South America. Cells 2 and 3 situated in Venezuela and E. bolivarensis Cruden supported them. Ecuador housed cell 4 with E. lehmannii (Baker) Marais & Reilly. Last of all, Peru had cell 5 and E. weberbaueri (Poelln.) Cruden defined it. Micro-endemic species are common in Echeandia (Cruden, 2009) and our results confirmed this observation. Since, in South America they were geographically isolated from other species.

Monocot geophyte diversification and distribution are correlated with wide temperature ranges and precipitation seasonality (Cuéllar-Martínez & Sosa, 2016; Sosa & Loera, 2017; Howard et al., 2019). The MTZ includes the major mountain chains in Mexico and has a complex tectonic and volcanic history (Mastretta-Yanes et al., 2015). It also shows temperature gradients and rain seasonality. Such topographic and climatic diversity promotes speciation, accumulation of species via dispersal, persistence and endemism. Overall, angiosperm spatial richness distribution and endemism patterns fall along the MTZ (Cruz-Cárdenas et al., 2013; Rodríguez et al., 2018; Sosa & De-Nova, 2012). And particularly, Echeandia fits perfectly in this scenario. We hope this species rich genus will promote botanical exploration leading to the discovery of novelties and contributes to build up a strategy for the species conservation of the genus in situ and ex situ.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (Conacyt). Also, we are grateful to the curators of the herbaria of BRIT, CICY, CIIDIR, HGOM, IEB, MEXU, SLPM, UAT, UAMIZ, XAL, and ZEA for the facilities provided. Thanks to Mollie Harker for reviewing the final version of this manuscript and for her valuable observations. Finally, we are grateful with Leticia Hernández and Eduardo Ruiz Sánchez, whose observations were very useful in the development of this project.

References

Alcántara, O., & Paniagua, M. (2007). Patrones de distribución y conservación de plantas endémicas. In I. Luna, J. J. Morrone, & D. Espinosa (Eds.), Biodiversidad de la Faja Volcánica Transmexicana (pp. 421–438). México D.F.: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. https://doi.org/10.22201/ib.20078706e.2012.1.786 

APG IV. (2016). An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG IV. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 181, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/boj.12385 

Aragón-Parada, J., Carrillo-Reyes, P., Rodríguez, A., & Munguía-Lino, G. (2019). Diversidad y distribución geográfica del género Sedum (Crassulaceae) en la Sierra Madre del Sur, México. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad, 90, e902921. https://doi.org/10.22201/ib.20078706e.2019.90.2921 

Badgley, C., Smiley, T. M., Terry, R., Davis, E. B., DeSantis, L. R. G., Fox, D. L. et al. (2017). Biodiversity and topographic complexity: modern and geohistorical perspectives. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 32, 211–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2016.12.010 

Barthlott, W., Mutke, J., Rafiqpoor D., Kier, G., & Kreft, H. (2005). Global centers of vascular plant diversity. Nova Acta Leopoldina NF, 92, 61–83. https://doi.org/10.3112/erdkunde.2007.04.01 

Bloom, T. D. S., Flower, A., & DeChaine, E. G. (2017). Why georeferencing matters: introducing a practical protocol to prepare species ocurrence records for spatial analysis. Ecology and Evolution, 8, 765–777. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3516

Bogler, D. J., Pires, J. C., & Francisco-Ortega, J. (2006). Phylogeny of Agavaceae based on ndhF, rbcL, and ITS sequences: implications of molecular data for classification. Aliso, 22, 313–328. https://doi.org/10.5642/aliso.20062201.26 

Brummitt, R. K. (2001). World geographical scheme for recording plant distributions. Edition 2. Pittsburgh, USA: Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation, Carnegie Mellon University. Available online at: http://www.tdwg.org/standards/109 

Carrasco-Ortiz, M., Munguía-Lino, G., Castro-Castro, A., Vargas-Amado, G., Harker, M., & Rodríguez, A. (2019). Riqueza, distribución geográfica y estado de conservación del género Dahlia (Asteraceae) en México. Acta Botanica Mexicana, 126, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.21829/abm126.2019.1354 

Castro-Castro, A. (2017). Los amoles, izotes, magueyes, nardos y yucas (familia Agavaceae). In A. A. Cruz, H. A. Ordorica, P. J. Valero, & E. D. Melgarejo (Eds.), La biodiversidad en Jalisco estudio de estado. Volumen 2 (pp. 135–141). Guadalajara, México: Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad/ Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo Territorial. Available online at: https://bioteca.biodiversidad.gob.mx/janium-bin/sumario.pl?Id=20210113135429 

Castro-Castro, A., Flores-Argüelles, A., Hernández-López, L., & Rodríguez, A. (2016). Polianthes quilae (Poliantheae, Agavaceae), a new and endemic species to western Mexico. Systematic Botany, 41, 720–726. https://doi.org/10.1600/036364416×692316 

Castro-Castro, A., Zamora-Tavares, P., Carrillo-Reyes, P., & Rodríguez, A. (2018). Manfreda santana-michelii (Asparagaceae subfamily Agavoideae), a striking new species from Sierra Madre del Sur in western Mexico. Systematic Botany, 43, 497–501. https://doi.org/10.1600/036364418×697229 

Chase, M. W., Reveal, J. L., & Fay, M. F. (2009). A subfamilial classification for the expanded asparagalean families Amaryllidaceae, Asparagaceae and Xanthorrhoeaceae. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 161, 132–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2009.00999.x 

Chen, S., Kim, D. K., Chase, M. W., & Kim, J. H. (2013). Networks in a large-scale phylogenetic analysis: reconstructing evolutionary history of Asparagales (Lilianae) based on four plastid genes. Plos One, 8, e59472. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059472 

Cruden, R. W. (1981). New Echeandia (Liliaceae) from Mexico. Sida, 9, 139–146.

Cruden, R. W. (1986). New species of Echeandia (Liliaceae) from Central America. Phytologia, 59, 373–380. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.part.2772 

Cruden, R. W. (1987). New species of Echeandia (Liliaceae) from Nueva Galicia. Contributions of the University of Michigan Herbarium, 16, 129–133.

Cruden, R. W. (1989). A new Echeandia (Liliaceae) from Venezuelan Guayana. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 76, 350. https://doi.org/10.2307/2399352 

Cruden, R. W. (1993). New species of Echeandia (Liliaceae) from Oaxaca, Mexico. Phytologia, 74, 128–137.

Cruden, R. W. (1994). Echeandia. In G. Davidse, M. Sousa, & A. O. Chater (Eds.), Flora Mesoamericana 6: Alismataceae a Cyperaceae (pp. 27–30). México D.F.: Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.

Cruden, R. W. (1999). A new subgenus and fifteen new species of Echeandia (Anthericaceae) from Mexico and the United States. Novon, 9, 325–338. https://doi.org/10.2307/3391730 

Cruden, R. W. (2009). A synopsis of South American Echeandia (Anthericaceae). Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 96, 251–267. https://doi.org/10.3417/2002129 

Cruden, R. W., & McVaugh, R. (1989). Echeandia. In W. R. Anderson (Ed.), Flora Novo-Galiciana: a descriptive account of the vascular plants of western Mexico. Volume 15: Bromeliaceae to Dioscoreaceae (pp. 178–197). Ann Arbor, Michigan: The University of Michigan Herbarium.

Cruz-Cárdenas, G., Villaseñor, J. L., López-Mata, L., & Ortiz, E. (2013). Distribución espacial de la riqueza de especies de plantas vasculares en México. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad, 84, 1189–1199. https://doi.org/10.7550/rmb.
31811 

Cuéllar-Martínez, M., & Sosa, V. (2016). Diversity patterns of monocotyledonous geophytes in Mexico. Botanical Sciences, 94, 687–699. https://doi.org/10.17129/botsci.763 

Darlington, P. J. (1957). Zoogeography: the geographical distribution of animals. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Delgado-Salinas, A., Bibler, R., & Lavin, M. (2006). Phylogeny of the genus Phaseolus (Leguminosae): a recent diversification in an ancient landscape. Systematic Botany, 31, 779–791. https://doi.org/10.1600/036364406779695960 

Espejo-Serna, A. (2012). El endemismo en las Liliopsida mexicanas. Acta Botanica Mexicana, 100, 195–257. https://doi.org/10.21829/abm100.2012.36 

Espejo-Serna, A., & López-Ferrari, A. R. (1993). Las monocotiledóneas mexicanas: una sinopsis florística. Lista de referencia II: Anthericaceae, Araceae, Arecaceae, Asparagaceae, Asphodelaceae y Asteliaceae. México D.F.: Consejo Nacional de la Flora de México/ Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Iztapalapa/ Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad.

Ferrusquía-Villafranca, I. (1993). Geology of Mexico: a synopsis. In T. P. Ramamoorthy, R. Bye, A. Lot, & J. Fa (Eds.), Biological diversity of Mexico: origins and distribution (pp. 3–107). New York: Oxford University Press.

García-Mendoza, A. (2002). Distribution of Agave (Agavaceae) in Mexico. Cactus and Succulent Journal, 74, 177–188.

García-Mendoza, A. (2004). Agaváceas. In A. García-Mendoza, J. Ordoñez, & M. Briones-Salas (Eds.), Biodiversidad en Oaxaca (pp. 159–170). Ciudad de México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.

García-Mendoza, A. (2011). Agavaceae. Flora del Valle de Tehuacán-Cuicatlán. Fascículo 88. México D.F.: Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.

GBIF (2018). Global Biodiversity Information Facility. Available online at: https://www.gbif.org/ 

Gernandt, D. S., & Pérez-de la Rosa, J. A. (2014). Biodiversidad de Pinophyta (coníferas) en México. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad, 85 Supl., S126–S133. https://doi.org/10.7550/rmb.32195 

Google. 2018. Google Earth Pro Software 4.2. Available online at: https://www.google.com/intl/es-419/earth/ 

Good-Avila, S. V., Souza, V., Gaut, B. S., & Eguiarte, L. E. (2006). Timing and rate of speciation in Agave (Agavaceae). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103, 9124–9129. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0603312103 

Gutiérrez-Ortega, J. S., Salinas-Rodríguez, M. M., Martínez, J. F., Molina-Freaner, F., Pérez-Farrera, M. A., Vovides, A. P. et al. (2018). The phylogeography of the cycad genus Dioon (Zamiaceae) clarifies its Cenozoic expansion and diversification in the Mexican transition zone. Annals of Botany, 121, 535–548. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcx165 

Halffter, G. (1964). La entomofauna americana, ideas acerca de su origen y distribución. Folia Entomológica Mexicana, 6, 1–108.

Hijmans, R. J., & Spooner, D. M. (2001). Geographic distribution of wild potato species. American Journal of Botany, 88, 2101–2112. https://doi.org/10.2307/3558435 

Hijmans, R. J., Guarino, L., Bussink, C., Mathur, P., Cruz, M., Berrantes, I. et al. (2004). DIVA-GIS versión 4. Un sistema de información geográfica para el análisis de distribución de especies: Manual. Lima, Perú: Centro Internacional de la Papa, Instituto Internacional de Recursos Genéticos Vegetales.

Hipp, A. L., Manos, P. S., González-Rodríguez, A., Hahn, M., Kaproth, M., McVay, J. D. et al. (2018). Sympatric parallel diversification of major oak clades in the Americas and the origins of Mexican species diversity. New Phytologist, 217, 439–452. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14773 

Howard, C. C., Folk, R. A., Beaulieu, J. M., & Cellinese, N. (2019). The monocotyledonous underground: global climatic and phylogenetic patterns of geophyte diversity. American Journal of Botany, 106, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajb2.1289 

INEGI. (2010). Archivo histórico de localidades geoestadísticas. Available online at: https://www.inegi.org.mx/ 

Jiménez-Barron, O., García-Sandoval, R., Magallón, S., García-Mendoza, A., Nieto-Sotelo, J., Aguirre-Planter, E. et al. (2020). Phylogeny, diversification rate, and divergence time of Agave sensu lato (Asparagaceae), a group of recent origin in the process of diversification. Frontiers in Plant Science, 11, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.536135 

Laffan, S. W., & Crisp, M. D. (2003). Assessing endemism at multiple spatial scales, with an example from the Australian vascular flora. Journal of Biogeography, 30, 511–520. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2699.2003.00875.x 

Laffan, S. W., Lubarsky, E., & Rosauer, D. F. (2010). Biodiverse, a tool for the spatial analysis of biological and related diversity. Ecography, 33, 643–647.

Leopold, A. S. (1950). Vegetation zones of Mexico. Ecology, 33, 507–518. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1931569 

López-Ferrari, A. R., & Espejo-Serna, A. (1995). Anthericaceae. Flora de Veracruz: Fascículo 86. Xalapa, Veracruz: Instituto de Ecología, A.C.

López-Ferrari, A. R., Espejo-Serna, A., & Ceja-Romero, J. (2002). Una nueva especie de Echeandia (Anthericaceae) de Guerrero, México. Novon, 12, 77–79. https://doi.org/10.2307/3393242 

Mastretta-Yanes, A., Moreno-Letelier, A., Piñero, D., Jorgensen, T. H., & Emerson, B. C. (2015). Biodiversity in the Mexican highlands and the interaction of geology, geography and climate within the Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt. Journal of Biogeography, 42, 1586–1600. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.12546 

McKain, M. R., McNeal, J. R., Kellar, P. R., Eguiarte, L. E., Pires, J. C., & Leebens-Mack, J. (2016). Timing of rapid diversification and convergent origins of active pollination within Agavoideae (Asparagaceae). American Journal of Botany, 103, 1717–1729. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1600198 

Morrone, J. J. (2014). Biogeographical regionalization of the Neotropical region. Zootaxa, 3782, 4–110. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3782.1.1 

Morrone, J. J. (2017). Biogeographic regionalization of the Sierra Madre del Sur province, Mexico. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad, 88, 710–714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmb.2017.07.012 

Morrone, J. J., Escalante, T., & Rodríguez-Tapia, G. (2017). Mexican biogeographic provinces: map and shapefiles. Zootaxa, 4277, 277–279. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4277.2.8 

Munguía-Lino, G., Vargas-Amado, G., Vázquez-García, L. M., & Rodríguez, A. (2015). Riqueza y distribución geográfica de la tribu Tigridieae (Iridaceae) en Norteamérica. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad, 86, 80–98. https://doi.org/10.7550/rmb.44083 

Phillips, S. J., & Wentworth, P. (2000). A natural history of the Sonoran Desert. Tucson: Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum Press.

Pires, J. C., Maureira, I., Givnish, T. J., Sytsma, K. J., Seberg, O., Petersen, G. et al. (2006). Phylogeny, genome size, and chromosome evolution of Asparagales. Aliso, 22, 287–304. https://doi.org/10.5642/aliso.20062201.24 

QGIS Development Team. (2018). QGIS Geographic Information System. Open Source Geospatial Foundation Project. Available online at: https://www.qgis.org/ 

Rodríguez, A., & Castro-Castro, A. (2005). Notas sobre Echeandia pihuamensis, E. robusta y E. sinaloensis y estado de conservación de las especies mexicanas. Ibugana, 13, 3–9.

Rodríguez, A., & Ortiz-Catedral, L. (2013). Echeandia novogaliciana and E. crudeniana (Anthericaceae): two new species from western Mexico. Brittonia, 65, 345–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12228-012-9293-6 

Rodríguez, A., Castro-Castro, A., Vargas-Amado, G., Vargas-Ponce, O., Zamora-Tavares, P., González-Gallegos, J. et al. (2018). Richness, geographic distribution patterns, and areas of endemism of selected angiosperm groups in Mexico. Journal of Systematics and Evolution, 56, 537–549. https://doi.org/10.1111/jse.12457 

Rodríguez, A., & Ortiz-Brunel, J. P. (2019). Echeandia jaliscensis (Asparagaceae) a new species from Jalisco, Mexico. Phytotaxa, 414, 29–34. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.414.1.3 

Rzedowski, J. (1986). Vegetación de México. México D.F.: Limusa.

Rzedowski, J. (2019). Los géneros de fanerógamas que, sin ser exclusivos de México, dan carácter a su flora. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad, 90, e902946. http://dx.doi.org/10.22201/ib.20078706e.2019.90.2946 

Salinas-Rodríguez, M. M., Estrada-Castillón, E., & Villarreal-Quintanilla, J. A. (2017). Endemic vascular plants of the Sierra Madre Oriental, Mexico. Phytotaxa, 328, 1–52. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.328.1.1 

Sánchez-Chávez, E., Rodríguez, A., Castro-Castro, A., Pérez-Farrera, M. A., & Sosa, V. (2019). Spatio-temporal evolution of climbing habit in the Dahlia–Hidalgoa group (Coreopsidae, Asteraceae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 135, 166–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2019.03.012 

Santiago-Alvarado, M., Montaño-Arias, G., & Espinosa, D. (2016). Áreas de endemismo de la Sierra Madre del Sur. In I. Luna-Vega, D. Espinosa, & R. Contreras-Medina (Eds.), Biodiversidad de la Sierra Madre del Sur (pp. 431–448). México D.F.: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.

Sosa, V., & De-Nova, J. A. (2012). Endemic angiosperm lineages in Mexico: hotspots for conservation. Acta Botanica Mexicana, 100, 293–315. https://doi.org/10.21829/abm100.2012.38 

Sosa, V., Cameron, K. M., Angulo D. F., & Hernández-Hernández, T. (2016). Life form evolution in epidendroid orchids: ecological consequences of the shift from epiphytism to terrestrial habits in Hexalectris. Taxon, 65, 235–248. https://doi.org/10.12705/652.2 

Sosa, V., & Loera, I. (2017). Influence of current climate, historical climate stability and topography on species richness and endemism in Mesoamerican geophyte plants. PeerJ, 5, e3932. https://doi: 10.7717/peerj.3932 

Suárez-Mota, M. E., & Villaseñor, J. L. (2011). Las compuestas endémicas de Oaxaca, México: diversidad y distribución. Boletín de la Sociedad Botánica de México, 88, 55–66. https://doi.org/10.17129/botsci.308 

Thiers, B. (2020). Index Herbariorum: a global directory of public herbaria an associated staff. New York Botanical Garden´s Virtual Herbarium. Available online at: http://sweetgum.nybg.org/ih/ 

Torres-Miranda, A., Luna-Vega, I., & Oyama, K. (2013). New approaches to the biogeography and areas of endemism of red oaks (Quercus L., Section Lobatae). Systematic Biology, 62, 555–573. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syt021 

Udvardy, M. D. F. (1975). A classification of the biogeographical provinces of the world. IUCN Occasional Paper, 18, 5–46. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0376892900019226 

Ulloa-Ulloa, C., Acevedo-Rodríguez, P., Beck, S., Belgrano, M. J., Bernal, R., Berry, P. E. et al. (2017). An integrated assessment of the vascular plant species of the Americas. Science, 358, 1614–1617. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao0398 

Vargas-Amado, G., Castro-Castro, A., Harker, M., Villaseñor, J. L., Ortiz, E., & Rodríguez, A. (2013). Distribución geográfica y riqueza del género Cosmos (Asteraceae: Coreopsideae). Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad, 84, 536–555. http://dx.doi.org/10.7550/rmb.31481 

Villaseñor, J. L. (2016). Checklist of the native vascular plants of Mexico. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad, 87, 559–902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmb.2016.06.017 

Villaseñor, J. L., & Ortiz, E. (2007). La familia Asteraceae. In I. Luna, J. J. Morrone, & D. Espinosa (Eds.), Biodiversidad de la Faja Volcánica Transmexicana (pp. 289–310). México D.F.: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.

Villaseñor, J. L., & Ortiz, E. (2014). Biodiversidad de las plantas con flores (División Magnoliophyta) en México. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad, 85, 134–142. http://dx.doi.org/10.7550/rmb.31987 

Wallace, A. R. (1876). The geographical distribution of animals. Vol. I y II. New York: Harper and Brothers.

Whittaker, R. J., Araújo, M. B., Jepson, P., Ladle, R. J., Watson, J. E. M., & Willis, K. J. (2005). Conservation biogeography: assessment and prospect. Diversity and Distributions, 11, 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1366-9516.2005.00143.x 

Willis, F., Moat, J., & Paton, A. (2003). Defining a role for herbarium data in Red List assessments: a case study of Plectranthus from eastern and southern tropical Africa. Biodiversity and Conservation, 12, 1537–1552. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023679329093